PaperlinX Green Shareholders' Group

Index to this Site

What were our forests like, before the white man arrived?

What has happened to our forests since Europeans arrived?

What happens after clear felling?

What options does PaperlinX have to reduce its dependence on native forest?

What has been the response of PaperlinX's board to the approaches of the Ethical Shareholders' Group?

Political issues connected with native forest exploitation.

The Nature of the Group.


The Code of Forest Practice for Timber Production.
The Code provides guidelines for timber harvesting.
The Code of Forest Practice.


Problems arising in the logging coupes.
The following illustrations are taken from plantations on land owned or leased by Australian Paper Plantations, which has been a wholly owned subsidiary of PaperlinX.
In September 2001 it is expected that control of these plantations will pass to Hancocks Victorian Plantations to whom they have been sold by PaperlinX.
A new subsidiary, Grand Ridge Plantations will then be responsible for all Hancocks' plantations in the Strzeleckis.
Grand Ridge Plantations has contracts in place with PaperlinX for continuing supply of timber.
We will watch Grand Ridge Plantations' environmental performance with interest.

Water Quantity.

Water Quality.

Erosion.

Logging on Steep Slopes.

Buffer Zones.

Gullies and Watercourses.

Roads and Snig Tracks.

Drains and Culverts.

Logging Coupe Planning.

Operating in Wet Weather.

Burning.

Chemical and Oil Spills.

Weeds and Diseases.

Protected Species.

Re-Vegetation.

Animals of the Bush.

Look at PaperlinX's own web site for general information about the company.
PaperlinX's Web Site.

And at PaperlinX's Environment page for their statement on the subject.
PaperlinX's Environment page.

The Native Forest Network provides another perspective on logging by Australian companies.
Native Forest Network Web Site.



Return to Home page.